7/1/2023 0 Comments Avowed synonym![]() 58.1), the type of which is necessarily the same as that of the name which it replacedĮx. ![]() This procedure is not the same as publishing an avowed substitute (replacement name, nomen novum) for a validly published but illegitimate name The publication of a name for a taxon previously known under a misapplied name must be valid under Grummann's combination was not validly published. 1928), who gave the full citation of the basionym, Nyl., Z 5: 521", in which "Z 5" referred to Zahlbruckner (Cat. 1963) introduced a new combination in the form Index of fungi none of these combinations was validly published. Meliola, omitted references to places of publication of basionyms, stating that they could be found in Petrak's lists or in the 1954), in proposing 142 new combinations in Mere reference to the Index kewensis, the Index of fungi, or any work other than that in which the name was validly published does not constitute a full and direct reference to the original publication of a name (but see Art. Pyrus, not Mespilus, and publication was in 1799, not 1800 these errors are treated as bibliographic errors of citation and do not invalidate the publication of the new combination.ģ3.5. 1800." Willdenow treated these plants in the genus 1969) was published as a new combination "Based on 33.2), do not invalidate publication of a new combination or nomen novum.Įx. Errors in the citation of the basionym or replaced synonym, including incorrect author citation As this refers to the pagination of Boeswinkel's entire paper, not of the protologue of the intended basionym alone, the combination was not validly published by Peerally.ģ3.4. "Cylindrocladiella infestans Boesw., Can. When proposing "Cylindrocladium infestans", Peerally (in Mycotaxon 40: 337. For the purpose of this Code, a page reference (for publications with a consecutive pagination) is a reference to the page or pages on which the basionym was validly published or on which the protologue is printed, but not to the pagination of the whole publication unless it is coextensive with that of the protologue.Įx. Saunders) Kjeldsen & Phinney by giving a full and direct reference to the place of valid publication of the basionym. ![]() ) cited the basionym and its author but without reference to its place of valid publication. Giffordia, Kjeldsen & Phinney (in Madroño 22: 90. A new combination, or an avowed substitute (replacement name, nomen novum), published on or after 1 January 1953 based on a previously and validly published name is not validly published unless its basionym (name-bringing or epithet-bringing synonym) or the replaced synonym (when a new name is proposed) is clearly indicated and a full and direct reference given to its author and place of valid publication, with page or plate reference and date (but see Art. taccada (Gaertn.) Roxb., not as the name of a new species, even though Gaertner is not referred to in Roxburgh's protologue.ģ3.3. (1788), it is treated as a new combination, S. As the name applies to the species previously described as Scaevola taccada was validly published by Roxburgh (1814) by reference to an illustration in Rheede (Hort. If, for a presumed new combination, no reference to a basionym is given but the epithet of a previously and validly published name that applies to the same taxon is adopted, the new combination is validly published as such if, and only if, it would otherwise be validly published as the name of a new taxon (see also Art. 1867) on the basis of their listing of " Cnidium peucedanoides, H. Similarly, the combination Eulophus peucedanoides is not to be attributed to Bentham & Hooker (Gen. ciliata, since Rafinesque did not definitely associate the epithet ciliata 1819) does not constitute valid publication of the combinationī. Combinations not validly published: Rafinesque's statement underīlephilia that "Le type de ce genre est la Monarda ciliata Linn." (in J. Nomenclator botanicus by the arrangement of the epithets in a list headed by the name of the genus, and in general by any typographical device which associates an epithet with a particular generic or specific name.Įx. 8, by the inclusion of the epithet in parentheses immediately after the name of the genus, in Steudel's ![]() Combinations validly published: In Linnaeus's Species plantarum the placing of the epithet in the margin opposite the name of the genus clearly associates the epithet with the name of the genus. A combination (autonyms excepted) is not validly published unless the author definitely associates the final epithet with the name of the genus or species, or with its abbreviation.Įx. CONDITIONS AND DATES OF VALID PUBLICATION OF NAMESģ3.1. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code), Electronic versionĬHAPTER IV. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |